some text

Selected Topics in Political Science: Freedom, Slavery, and the Law

PAPER INSTRUCTION FROM CUSTOMER

Assignment topic: Selected Topics in Political Science: Freedom, Slavery, and the Law

Number of Pages:  2 pages / 550 words

Format: MLA

Part I: State how you believe Finkelman answers his two beginning questions in Chapter 5: Was Taney’s Dred Scott opinion an aberration, a mistake by an aging, 80 year old justice? Or was that opinion a culmination of Taney’s career focused on supporting slavery and persecuting free blacks? Do you agree or disagree with Finkelman’s conclusion as you understand it? Explain in a paragraph or two why you agree or disagree.

(PLEASE REFER TO CHAPTER 5 OF Finkelman, Paul. Supreme Injustice: Slavery and the Nation’s Highest Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.)

Part II: Read Taney’s opinion for the Supreme Court in Williams v. Ash. Williams v Ash. Then type your answers to the following:
1. Describe in a paragraph or two the relevant provision in Maria Ann T. Greenfield’s will and why Taney affirmed the freedom judgment in favor of James Ash.
2. Based on all that you have read so far in this course, write two or three paragraphs stating whether you believe Taney’s decision in this case is consistent or inconsistent with his views on slavery and race as expressed in his Dred Scott opinion.

ESSAY WRITTEN SOLUTION

View Sample Solution Pdf

Selected Topics in Political Science: Freedom, Slavery, and the Law

Part I: State how you believe Finkelman answers his two beginning questions in Chapter 5: Was Taney’s Dred Scott opinion an aberration, a mistake by aging, 80-year-old justice? Or was that opinion a culmination of Taney’s career focused on supporting slavery and persecuting free blacks? Do you agree or disagree with Finkelman’s conclusion as you understand it? Explain in a paragraph or two why you agree or disagree.

(PLEASE REFER TO CHAPTER 5 OF Finkelman, Paul. Supreme Injustice: Slavery and the Nation’s Highest Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.)

The uncelebrated judgment against Dred Scott’s plea for freedom came as a big blow to the anti-racists and the black Americans. They were optimistic about enjoying freedom, just like the Native Americans. Justice Taney, a US Supreme court justice affirmed that all blacks’ whether enslaved or free, were not American citizens and could never acquire American nationality (“Scott V. Sandford” 2). The jury also declared Missouri Compromise unconstitutional unlawful and upheld slavery in the ancient American. Taney, a pro-slavery justice, further asserted that Dred Scot was black and, therefore, not an American. Consequently, he had no right like white men, and the phrase “all men are equal,” excluded the blacks since they were slaves, unlike the white men.

Paul Finkelman, attempts to decode the factors that influenced the judge’s decision in his book “Supreme Injustice; Slavery in the Nation’s Highest Court.” The author points out personal and political considerations as the primary motivators of pro-racial judgment by the jury. The author states that Taney was a slave owner who believed that black Negros came to the US as commodities, and therefore they were not supposed to enjoy the same rights as the Native Americans (“Scott V. Sandford” 2). I support the author’s assertion because Taney seems to devalue blacks by claiming that the equality granted to “all men” excluded blacks who were primarily slaves.

Part II: Read Taney’s opinion for the Supreme Court in Williams v. Ash. Williams v Ash. Then type your answers to the following:

Describe in a paragraph or two the relevant provision in Maria Ann T. Greenfield’s will and why Taney affirmed 1the freedom judgment in favor of James Ash.

James Ash petitioned his freedom from slavery after his owner bequeathed him to the owner’s nephew on condition that the nephew does not sell the slaves or take them away from Maryland. In contrary to the will, Gerard T. Greenfield, the late owner’s nephew, sells out James Ash, who decides to file a petition in pursuit of his freedom based on the breach of the late owner’s will (“Williams V. Ash, 42 U.S. 1” 3). Taney ruled in favor of the petitioner, asserting that it was important to honor Maria Greenfield’s will; which she imposed on her property, including her slaves when she wrote: “provided he shall not carry them out of the state of Maryland, or sell them to anyone; in either of which events I will and devise the said negroes to be free for life.”

  1. Based on all that you have read so far in this course, write two or three paragraphs stating whether you believe Taney’s decision, in this case, is consistent or inconsistent with his views on slavery and race, as expressed in his Dred Scott opinion.

Although some people may view this particular ruling by Judge Taney as in favor of a black man, I believe Taney considered James Ash as a property of the late Maria Greenfield. A portion of his ruling read that “the bequest in the will was a conditional limitation of freedom to the petitioner, and that it took effect the moment he was sold” and consequently upheld the restriction in her will. Just like in his previous rulings where he argued that slaves did not have any freedom, he believed that transferring the ownership of the slave sabotaged the intention of the original owner to limit the freedom of her property, the slaves.

Therefore, I consider Judge Taney as a pro-racist judge who thought that slaves were worthless commodities whose use was working for the white Native Americans. Although ruling in favor of James Ash seems to be a kind gesture, I believe his view that Native Americans owned the slaves, who had no rights, instigated his ruling in this case. Unlike Dred Scott, James Ash petitioned for freedom that his original owner granted him in her will (“Scott V. Sandford” 3). Taney upholds the ruling not because he wants to give freedom to the slave but because he honors the will of the late American.

Works Cited

“Scott V. Sandford”. 1857, Accessed 6 May 2020.

“Williams V. Ash, 42 U.S. 1”. 1843, Accessed 6 May 2020.

View Sample Solution Pdf

We hope the content provided above was helpful. In case you want your essay written by our experts, kindly feel free to place your order and get plagiarism-free content on any topic of your choice. We always deliver within the set deadlines. Thank you.

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Place Order
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency